Zorg ervoor dat Javascript is ingeschakeld voor de toegankelijkheid van de website JH Explorer “Jollof Wars” in West Africa: political changes in Nigeria and Ghana are stirring the pot - Janus Henderson Investors - Netherlands Professional Advisor
Voor financiële professionals in Nederland

JH Explorer “Jollof Wars” in West Africa: political changes in Nigeria and Ghana are stirring the pot

Portfolio Manager Sorin Pirău from the Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Team outlines his key takeaways from a research trip across West Africa, highlighting the unique challenges new governments face in Nigeria and Ghana.

Explorer in Ghana - the hustle and bustle of Accra
Sorin Pirău, CFA

Portefeuillebeheerder


28 Feb 2025
11 beknopt artikel

Kernpunten

  • Under President Tinubu, Nigeria launched major reforms like exchange rate unification and fuel price liberalisation, reshaping its economy. However, the next reform phase will be more challenging, requiring renewed dedication.
  • Ghana’s path to recovery following its default, guided by a reform programme backed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), emphasises the vital importance of fiscal discipline and balance sheet strengthening to restore economic stability and rebuild investor confidence.
  • Given the high-yield status of both countries, investors should closely monitor the progress of reforms in Nigeria and Ghana, as sovereign debt performance will be directly linked to the success and execution of these economic policies.
De JH Explorer-serie volgt onze beleggingsteams over de hele wereld en vertelt over hun praktijkonderzoek op land- en bedrijfsniveau.  


The “Jollof Wars” is a friendly rivalry between Ghana and Nigeria over who makes the best version of Jollof rice, a popular West African dish. Each country claims superiority in preparing this flavourful meal, leading to lively debates, social media banter, and culinary competitions. 

Judging a political transition is always a matter of perspective

The election of new leadership in any country is invariably viewed through a dual prism. On one side, proponents of the incoming administration view it as a beacon of change, an opportunity to rectify inefficiencies and eliminate obstacles that have hindered national progress. Conversely, critics of the new regime perceive these changes with scepticism, often endeavouring to impede the impact of the new policies — whether real or anticipated — until such time as they can regain influence. This dynamic is applicable to both Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM), which we witnessed firsthand during our recent visit to Ghana and Nigeria.

As highlighted in our Sri Lanka Explorer, embarking on a visit post-election—once the fervour of the campaign has subsided—enables investors to engage in more enlightened dialogue, concentrating on specific policies and their macroeconomic ramifications.

The low-hanging reform fruits in Nigeria are gone – are there riper ones for the picking?

In Nigeria, we found a nation still coming to terms with the far-reaching developments post the election of President Bola Tinubu in early 2023. From then and through to 2024, the landmark reforms have significantly reshaped the economic landscape. The unification of exchange rates in the summer of 2023 led to the Naira depreciating by over two-thirds of its value relative to the US Dollar[1]. Additionally, since October 2024, fuel prices have been completely liberalised (subsidies removed), facilitated by the launch of the Dangote refinery[2]. The combined fiscal cost of these subsidies was above 5% of GDP in 2022, according to the World Bank[3]. For a country which is struggling to raise its government revenues above 10% of GDP for so many years[4], these figures are staggering and underscore the unsustainable nature of the prior policy.

Central Bank of Nigeria

Under the stewardship of its new governor, Olayemi Cardoso, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) played a pivotal role in securing some of the initial successes of President Tinubu’s administration. These include:

  • halting deficit monetisation through “ways and means advances”,
  • eliminating widespread foreign exchange (FX) and import restrictions,
  • implementing monetary policy tightening,
  • and liberalizing FX.

These measures were instrumental in rejuvenating activity in the interbank FX market and in bolstering gross international reserves. Despite the positive developments, the net reserve position – a measure of a country’s liquidity – continues to be an enigma. We were heartened by the governor’s pledge to begin issuing regular updates on this figure starting later this year. Although the exact figure remains unclear, the trend has been unmistakably favourable since the release of the CBN’s audited financial statements back in August 2023, which had revealed a much weaker net reserves position than the market had anticipated.

Figure 1: Gross International Reserves

Gross international reserves in Nigeria

Source: Janus Henderson Investors, as at 27 February 2025. 

“People don’t eat reforms”.

This was a mantra we heard in more than one meeting. In our discussions, these pivoted towards strategies for ensuring that the benefits of these reforms result in concrete social advancements. The authorities are currently concentrating on creating additional fiscal room to support increased social expenditure, necessary to counter the escalation in food insecurity and poverty, alongside managing heightened debt servicing obligations.

Improving Africa’s largest oil producer’s fiscal position

From a fiscal perspective, the 2025 budget was characterised by many of our interlocutors as being built on rosy assumptions on growth and oil production, which is targeted to reach 2.06m barrels per day (bpd) this year. Recent data indicates a production level of around 1.7m bpd[5], but since the easy gains are already achieved, there was widespread scepticism about Nigeria’s ability to close the remaining gap by the end of the year. Nevertheless, the pursuit of these ambitions raises the question of whether Nigeria might find itself at odds with OPEC, given its quota of 1.5m bpd. We believe that the pressing need for increased revenue in the short term creates a compelling incentive to surpass this quota, should the opportunity arise.

Debt management Office, Abuja, Nigeria


Sorin Pirău at the Debt Management Office (DMO), Abuja, Nigeria
Debt management office, Abuja

 

Locals were keenly awaiting further details on an impending audit designed to reconcile what is owed by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation or NNPC – the fully state-owned oil company of Nigeria – to the Federal Government and vice versa to better estimate the fiscal space created by the abolition of fuel subsidies. Enhancing the transparency of oil revenues remains a critical yet unresolved area of reform under President Tinubu’s administration. However, addressing this issue is essential before NNPC can proceed with plans to issue a Eurobond or undertake an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

During our visit, the ‘Tax Reform Bills’, aimed at simplifying, improving and enhancing the efficiency of tax administration, were progressing through the National Assembly. They were anticipated to be implemented in the latter half of this year, but the size of their impact on the fiscal position remains uncertain. Overall, we anticipate an improvement in Nigeria’s fiscal situation over the medium term, despite the ongoing challenge of debt affordability, as interest payments continue to consume approximately 30% of general government revenues, one of the highest ratios in our investment universe[6].

Going forward Nigeria’s market perception will hinge on the government’s success in executing the more challenging second phase of reforms. These are centred on diversifying the economy, improving security, expanding the tax base, and boosting the quality and reliability of data. The latter represents a significant hurdle for the country, complicating the work of investors and hindering efficient policymaking by requiring decision-makers to sift through a haze of uncertainty.

Ghana forges ahead on its tough trek from debt default to economic recovery

For years, Ghana has been a staple investment destination for many investors in Sub-Saharan Africa. It led the way as an early participant in the region’s Eurobond market with its debut issuance in 2007 and enjoyed a series of macro tailwinds, such as a boost in oil production, which contributed to significant social progress. However, this growth was underpinned by increasing fiscal and external imbalances, leading to a fragile economic structure that ultimately collapsed following the pandemic. The country consequently defaulted on its external debt in late 2022, marking Africa’s largest Eurobond default to date[7].

Jubilee House, Accra

Presidential Palace, Jubilee House, Accra, Ghana
Presidential Palace, Jubilee House, Accra, Ghana

Unlike our last visit in early 2023, Ghana’s capital Accra had a markedly different atmosphere. It was no longer a country battling crisis on multiple fronts, but one that had emerged from a painful debt restructuring process, making commendable progress in its IMF programme and going through a political transition after the elections. These resulted in a significant win for the former president, John Mahama, and his party, the National Democratic Congress, granting them a constitutional majority and a strong popular mandate to steer the country back on course.

The focus of our discussions now revolved around whether the new government would adhere to the fiscal responsibilities outlined in the country’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement, which is up for review in April. The previous government’s commitment to increase revenues—a crucial requirement for both fiscal consolidation and to achieve the 18% external debt service-to-revenues target by 2028[8]—seems to conflict with Mahama’s campaign pledges to eliminate certain unpopular taxes introduced during the crisis. Nonetheless, it was reassuring to learn that the authorities are still dedicated to meeting the primary objectives of the programme and are only considering minor adjustments rather than a complete overhaul. There was also general optimism towards its 2025 budget, expected to be announced towards the end of the first quarter.

Officials were also hopeful regarding the schedule for completing all pending restructuring deals, including with bilateral creditors[9] and in the energy sector. Such advancements should pave the way for Ghana to transition out of its default status, initially moving up to CCC+, and subsequently aiming for a B- rating once the current IMF programme is completed successfully in 2026.

Gold rush

Examining Ghana’s external balance sheet reveals that it has gained from both debt relief provided by its external creditors and robust gold exports, which have bolstered its international reserves position. A significant boom in gold exports saw revenues climb to US$11.6 billion in 2024, accounting for nearly 60% of the country’s total exports[10]. Since late 2022, the Bank of Ghana (BoG) has initiated an extensive gold purchasing programme, known as “gold-for-reserves” which has enabled the country to exceed its net international reserves (NIR) targets[11] .

Sorin Pirău at the Ministry of Finance, Accra, Ghana

Ultimately, Ghana is favourably positioned at least over the short and medium term, thanks to a comprehensive IMF programme that anchors a constructive macroeconomic outlook and allows the country to stay outside international capital markets until at least mid-2026 when the ECF expires. The absence of any near-term bond issuance coupled with a relatively high carry, presents a compelling opportunity for active investors willing to reconsider Ghana as it rebounds from the aftermath of its last crisis.

Just as with Jollof, multiple recipes exist to address a debt crisis

While both countries share similarities, such as political transitions, challenges in revenue mobilisation, and exposure to commodity price fluctuations (oil for Nigeria, and primarily gold, along with oil to a lesser extent, for Ghana), their situations also diverge in significant ways. Ghana’s pre-existing vulnerabilities and insufficient policy response meant that the pandemic and tightening global financial conditions left it unable to rollover existing debt obligations, ultimately pushing it into a sovereign default. On the other hand, Nigeria, despite running a mix of unsustainable fiscal and monetary policies had a much longer runway, which gave just enough time for the new administration to reverse this toxic mix of policies without triggering a full-blown debt crisis.

However, Nigeria must now deal with the fallout from its previous missteps, including inflationary pressures, increased debt servicing costs amid growing public debt, domestic arrears, and deteriorating social indicators. In contrast, Ghana embarked on a different path by seeking debt service relief through restructuring, which technically improved the quality of its balance sheet. However, this came with considerable negative repercussions, as defaulting on debt is never a cost-free solution[12]. As both nations navigate through the aftermath of their previous policy choices, investors will closely scrutinise their journey ahead. Investors can find attractive opportunities in high yield countries regardless of their restructuring history, but careful consideration – including ‘on-site’ research visits like these – is essential to grasp each country’s distinctive path and accurately assess if current valuations reflect the associated risks.

 

Voetnoten

[1] Source: Macrobond, depreciation since 19 June 2023 to 27 February 2025. The policy was meant to unify all exchange rates into a single market-driven exchange rate to enhance transparency and appropriate price discovery in the foreign exchange market.

[2] The 650,000 barrel-per-day refinery built by Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote in Lagos started processing petrol in September 2024 and will soon hit full capacity, making it one of the world’s largest crude processing sites.

[3] Source: World Bank – Nigeria Development Update, October 2024.

[4] Source: Macrobond, IMF WEO, General Government Revenue, as at 27 February 2025.

[5] Source: Macrobond, Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), as at 27 February 2025. Production level includes condensates.

[6] Source: Fitch Ratings, 25 November 2024.

[7] In December 2022, Ghana announced a domestic debt exchange programme and a suspension of payments on external debt, including US$13bn of sovereign Eurobonds.

[8] Source: IMF, third review under the ECF, December 2024.

[9] On the day of our visit to Accra, the government  announced an MoU with its Official Creditor Committee (OCC), paving the way for signing bilateral agreements with each official creditor in the near term: Ghana’s Government has Signed a Memorandum of Understanding with its Official Creditor Committee | Ministry of Finance | Ghana

[10] Source: Ghana Central Bank, 27 January 2025.

[11] Source: Bank of Ghana, IMF, January 2025 and December 2024 respectively.

[12] For a more comprehensive analysis on the costs of sovereign defaults, see Costs of Sovereign Defaults: Restructuring Strategies, Bank Distress and the Capital Inflow-Credit Channel and The Social Costs of Sovereign Default | NBER

Deficit monetisation is when a government finances its deficit by issuing currency or central bank reserves instead of debt.

A net reserve position is the difference between a country’s reserve assets and its reserve liabilities. Reserve assets are claims on non-residents that are denominated in foreign convertible currencies. They include cash, securities, deposits abroad, and monetary gold. Reserve liabilities are foreign exchange liabilities to residents and non-residents. They include commitments to sell foreign exchange, and credit outstanding from the Fund.

Gross international reserves refers to the total value of a country’s foreign currency assets held by its central bank, including gold, Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), and other readily available foreign currencies

Fiscal balance is the difference between a government’s revenue and its spending.

External balance on goods and services equals exports of goods and services minus imports of goods and services.

External debt is the total amount of money a country owes to non-residents. It’s made up of a country’s liabilities to foreign creditors, including governments, corporations, and citizens.

The Extended Credit Facility (ECF) provides medium-term financial assistance to low-income countries (LICs) with protracted balance of payments problems. The ECF is one of the facilities under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT).

 

 

 

Dit zijn de standpunten van de auteur op het moment van publicatie en kunnen verschillen van de standpunten van andere personen/teams bij Janus Henderson Investors. Verwijzingen naar individuele effecten vormen geen aanbeveling om effecten, beleggingsstrategieën of marktsectoren te kopen, verkopen of aan te houden en mogen niet als winstgevend worden beschouwd. Janus Henderson Investors, zijn gelieerde adviseur of zijn medewerkers kunnen een positie hebben in de genoemde effecten.

 

Resultaten uit het verleden geven geen indicatie over toekomstige rendementen. Alle performancegegevens omvatten inkomsten- en kapitaalwinsten of verliezen maar geen doorlopende kosten en andere fondsuitgaven.

 

De informatie in dit artikel mag niet worden beschouwd als een beleggingsadvies.

 

Er is geen garantie dat tendensen uit het verleden zich zullen doorzetten of dat prognoses worden gehaald.

 

Reclame.

 

Begrippenlijst

 

 

 

Belangrijke informatie

Lees de volgende belangrijke informatie over fondsen die vermeld worden in dit artikel.

Het Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (het 'Fonds') is een Luxemburgse SICAV die op 30 mei 1985 is opgericht en wordt beheerd door Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. kan besluiten de marketingregelingen van deze beleggingsinstelling overeenkomstig de desbetreffende regelgeving te beëindigen. Dit is een marketingboodschap Raadpleeg de prospectus van de ICBE en het document met essentiële beleggersinformatie voordat u een definitieve beleggingsbeslissing neemt.
    Specifieke risico's
  • Het is mogelijk dat de emittent van een obligatie (of geldmarktinstrument) niet langer bereid of in staat is om rente of aflossing aan het Fonds te betalen. Als dit gebeurt of als de markt denkt dat dit kan gebeuren, zal de waarde van een obligatie dalen. Hoogrentende obligaties (niet van beleggingskwaliteit) zijn speculatiever van aard en daardoor gevoeliger voor ongunstige veranderingen in de marktomstandigheden.
  • Wanneer de rentevoeten stijgen (of dalen), zullen de prijzen van verschillende effecten anders worden beïnvloed. In het bijzonder zal de waarde van obligaties gewoonlijk dalen als de rentevoeten stijgen. Over het algemeen wordt dit risico groter naarmate de looptijd van een obligatiebelegging toeneemt.
  • Sommige obligaties (op verzoek aflosbare obligaties) geven hun emittenten het recht om kapitaal vervroegd terug te betalen of om de looptijd te verlengen. Emittenten kunnen deze rechten uitoefenen wanneer dit voor hen gunstig is en dit kan invloed hebben op de waarde van het Fonds.
  • Opkomende markten stellen het Fonds bloot aan een hogere volatiliteit en een hoger verliesrisico dan ontwikkelde markten. Ze zijn gevoelig voor ongunstige politieke en economische gebeurtenissen en ze zijn mogelijk minder goed gereguleerd en beschikken mogelijk over minder degelijke bewaar- en vereffeningsprocedures.
  • Het Fonds kan gebruikmaken van derivaten om zijn beleggingsdoelstelling te verwezenlijken. Dit kan leiden tot hefboomwerking, wat de resultaten van een belegging kan uitvergroten en waardoor de winsten of verliezen van het Fonds groter kunnen zijn dan de kosten van het derivaat. Het gebruik van derivaten gaat ook gepaard met andere risico's, waaronder met name het risico dat een tegenpartij bij derivaten niet in staat is om haar contractuele verplichtingen na te komen.
  • Wanneer het Fonds, of een afgedekte aandelenklasse/klasse van deelnemingsrechten, tracht de wisselkoersschommelingen van een valuta ten opzichte van de basisvaluta te beperken, kan de afdekkingsstrategie zelf een positieve of negatieve impact hebben op de waarde van het Fonds vanwege verschillen in de kortetermijnrentevoeten van de valuta's.
  • Effecten in het Fonds kunnen moeilijk te waarderen of te verkopen zijn op het gewenste moment of tegen de gewenste prijs, vooral in extreme marktomstandigheden waarin de prijzen van activa kunnen dalen, wat het risico op beleggingsverliezen verhoogt.
  • Het Fonds kan een hoger niveau van transactiekosten oplopen als gevolg van beleggingen in minder actieve markten of minder ontwikkelde markten in vergelijking met een fonds dat in actievere of meer ontwikkelde markten belegt.
  • De volledige lopende kosten of een deel daarvan kunnen aan het kapitaal worden onttrokken, wat het kapitaal kan uithollen of het potentieel voor kapitaalgroei kan verminderen.
  • CoCo's (Voorwaardelijk converteerbare obligaties) kunnen sterk in waarde dalen wanneer de financiële gezondheid van een emittent verzwakt en een vooraf bepaalde 'triggergebeurtenis' ertoe leidt dat de obligaties worden omgezet in aandelen van de emittent of gedeeltelijk of volledig worden afgeschreven.
  • Het Fonds kan geld verliezen als een tegenpartij met wie het Fonds handelt niet bereid of in staat is om aan zijn verplichtingen te voldoen, of als gevolg van een fout in of vertraging van operationele processen of verzuim van een derde partij.