Top-of-mind market risks for U.S. equities
Portfolio Managers Jeremiah Buckley, Brian Demain, and Jonathan Coleman believe that uncertainties around job growth, consumer spending, and artificial intelligence (AI) capital spending warrant close attention.
5 minute read
Key takeaways:
- Our 2024 Investor Survey revealed decreased risk appetite among investors, with a large percentage expressing concerns about near-term issues including the U.S. presidential election, geopolitical events, and persistent inflation for late 2024 into early 2025.
- Our portfolio managers, while acknowledging these concerns, are focused on broader economic themes like narrow job growth and consumer spending that could create slowdown pressures, as well as uncertain AI capital expenditure returns, as potential market risks.
- While it’s important to be mindful of all risks on the horizon, staying invested in quality companies and maintaining diversified portfolios can help investors mitigate exposure to those risks.
Janus Henderson’s 2024 Investor Survey shows U.S. mass affluent and high-net-worth investors have a decreased risk appetite in 2024 compared to 2023. When asked about their top concerns for late 2024 into early 2025, over 70% of respondents cited the U.S. presidential election, geopolitical events, and persistent inflation.
In light of these findings, we asked three of our U.S. equity portfolio managers what they deem key market risks in the months ahead. While the worries investors cited in the survey are not among our portfolio manager’s top areas of concern, that is not to say they are not important when assessing today’s market environment.
The inflation picture has improved considerably in 2024, yet higher prices are still having an impact on consumer spending. Geopolitical risks – namely the Russia-Ukraine war, China-Taiwan tensions, and Middle East conflicts – form a constant backdrop. These events threaten to disrupt supply chains, increase inflationary pressures, and undermine investor confidence. However, predicting the likelihood of such events is challenging, and we’d instead advocate for a focus on quality companies and a diversified portfolio to help mitigate the potential impact.
The U.S. presidential election could also cause near-term volatility, but we believe broader economic drivers and company fundamentals will be the prevailing influence over the market’s ultimate winners and losers.
Our portfolio managers remain largely optimistic about economic and earnings outlooks, but they offered the following perspective on the risks they’re tracking closely in the months ahead.
Jeremiah Buckley
Area of coverage: U.S. large-cap growth
Notable risk: Narrow job growth participation
The U.S. economy continues to provide a solid foundation for investment opportunities, but cooling labor market demand is a key economic risk that warrants close attention. Recent job gains have been primarily limited to hospitality, healthcare, government, and construction, while other sectors have shown minimal or declining employment growth (Figure 1).
This narrow focus is concerning as we approach full employment in the hospitality and healthcare industries in the post-pandemic recovery. Leading indicators for the construction sector are also showing signs of weakness, which could soon flow through to jobs. The lack of broader participation across sectors could slow overall job growth.
Further, AI’s impact on hiring in knowledge-based industries adds uncertainty. AI’s role in the future workforce has led to hesitation in hiring for certain positions, potentially exacerbating the job market’s imbalance. Combined, these factors suggest employment growth could become a pressing issue, possibly leading to reduced consumer spending and pressure on economic growth.
On a positive note, we did see material margin expansion in second-quarter earnings. Positive company operating margins and margin leverage are typically leading indicators for labor market growth. Also, it is possible that moderate labor and income gains can continue to support consumer spending.
Figure 1: Nonfarm Payroll – Share of total jobs created in past 12 months
75% of total jobs created in the past year have been in the education and health services, government, and hospitality sectors.
Source: Bloomberg, Nonfarm payroll, as at 31 August 2024.
Brian Demain
Area of coverage: U.S. mid-cap growth
Notable risk: Uncertain return on AI capital spending
Debate surrounding the return on investment in AI capital spending is one of today’s most important market issues. While AI offers immense potential as a productivity tool, the vast capital invested in AI infrastructure by tech giants (Figure 2) needs to generate returns. This massive investment is fueling excitement for companies supplying AI-related hardware and software, from industry giants like NVIDIA to numerous mid-cap firms.
Over the next few years, the market’s direction may hinge on how the perception and reality of AI’s return on investment evolve. If AI proves to be a valuable productivity enhancer and delivers strong gains to those that have adopted it, the AI-spending boom will likely continue. We may even find current spending is too low. Conversely, subpar gains could significantly slow the pace of investment.
Given this uncertainty, we are carefully monitoring the commercial success of various AI applications, from Microsoft Copilot to emerging startups, to better understand potential returns on AI investments. Additionally, we are focusing on businesses with strong fundamentals and differentiated offerings to help mitigate risks associated with a potential slowdown in AI spending.
Figure 2: Overall capital spending
The global economy is witnessing an unprecedented influx of capital into AI, primarily driven by hyperscale cloud companies.
Source: Bloomberg, quarterly data, as at 23 September 2024.
Jonathan Coleman
Area of coverage: U.S. small-cap growth
Notable risk: Consumer spending trends
A further slowdown in consumer spending is one of the more pressing concerns in the economy today and one investors should be mindful of. While there’s no definitive evidence of this trend spreading from lower-income to middle- or higher-income households, indicators suggest increasing financial strain. For instance, delinquency rates on credit cards and car payments are approaching cyclical peaks (Figure 3), and the extraordinary savings rate from COVID-19 stimulus has dissipated.
Moreover, higher interest rates, particularly on mortgage payments, are likely to weigh on consumer sentiment and spending. Even as interest rates may stabilize or decline with the Federal Reserve rate-cutting cycle, the cumulative effect on household budgets could persist.
To mitigate this risk, we’ve adopted a cautious approach to consumer discretionary stocks. While we believe that many valuations in this sector are reasonable, we are carefully assessing whether the potential upside justifies the uncertainty surrounding consumer spending trends.
Figure 3: Transition into delinquency by loan type
The share of credit card and auto loan balances transitioned into delinquency have increased to their highest levels since the Global Financial Crisis.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Percent of balance at least 30 days past due; quarterly data from Q1 2003 to Q2 2024, as at 31 August 2024.
Equity securities are subject to risks including market risk. Returns will fluctuate in response to issuer, political and economic developments.
Volatility measures risk using the dispersion of returns for a given investment.
Monetary Policy refers to the policies of a central bank, aimed at influencing the level of inflation and growth in an economy. It includes controlling interest rates and the supply of money.
Queste sono le opinioni dell'autore al momento della pubblicazione e possono differire da quelle di altri individui/team di Janus Henderson Investors. I riferimenti a singoli titoli non costituiscono una raccomandazione all'acquisto, alla vendita o alla detenzione di un titolo, di una strategia d'investimento o di un settore di mercato e non devono essere considerati redditizi. Janus Henderson Investors, le sue affiliate o i suoi dipendenti possono avere un’esposizione nei titoli citati.
Le performance passate non sono indicative dei rendimenti futuri. Tutti i dati dei rendimenti includono sia il reddito che le plusvalenze o le eventuali perdite ma sono al lordo dei costi delle commissioni dovuti al momento dell'emissione.
Le informazioni contenute in questo articolo non devono essere intese come una guida all'investimento.
Non vi è alcuna garanzia che le tendenze passate continuino o che le previsioni si realizzino.
Comunicazione di Marketing.
Important information
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- Le Azioni/Quote possono perdere valore rapidamente e di norma implicano rischi più elevati rispetto alle obbligazioni o agli strumenti del mercato monetario. Di conseguenza il valore del proprio investimento potrebbe diminuire.
- Gli emittenti di obbligazioni (o di strumenti del mercato monetario) potrebbero non essere più in grado di pagare gli interessi o rimborsare il capitale, ovvero potrebbero non intendere più farlo. In tal caso, o qualora il mercato ritenga che ciò sia possibile, il valore dell'obbligazione scenderebbe.
- L’aumento (o la diminuzione) dei tassi d’interesse può influire in modo diverso su titoli diversi. Nello specifico, i valori delle obbligazioni si riducono di norma con l'aumentare dei tassi d'interesse. Questo rischio risulta di norma più significativo quando la scadenza di un investimento obbligazionario è a più lungo termine.
- Il Fondo investe in obbligazioni ad alto rendimento (non investment grade) che, sebbene offrano di norma un interesse superiore a quelle investment grade, sono più speculative e più sensibili a variazioni sfavorevoli delle condizioni di mercato.
- Un Fondo che presenta un’esposizione elevata a un determinato paese o regione geografica comporta un livello maggiore di rischio rispetto a un Fondo più diversificato.
- Il Fondo potrebbe usare derivati al fine di conseguire il suo obiettivo d'investimento. Ciò potrebbe determinare una "leva", che potrebbe amplificare i risultati dell'investimento, e le perdite o i guadagni per il Fondo potrebbero superare il costo del derivato. I derivati comportano rischi aggiuntivi, in particolare il rischio che la controparte del derivato non adempia ai suoi obblighi contrattuali.
- Se il Fondo, o una sua classe di azioni con copertura, intende attenuare le fluttuazioni del tasso di cambio tra una valuta e la valuta di base, la stessa strategia di copertura potrebbe generare un effetto positivo o negativo sul valore del Fondo, a causa delle differenze di tasso d’interesse a breve termine tra le due valute.
- I titoli del Fondo potrebbero diventare difficili da valutare o da vendere al prezzo e con le tempistiche desiderati, specie in condizioni di mercato estreme con il prezzo delle attività in calo, aumentando il rischio di perdite sull'investimento.
- Le spese correnti possono essere prelevate, in tutto o in parte, dal capitale, il che potrebbe erodere il capitale o ridurne il potenziale di crescita.
- Il Fondo potrebbe perdere denaro se una controparte con la quale il Fondo effettua scambi non fosse più intenzionata ad adempiere ai propri obblighi, o a causa di un errore o di un ritardo nei processi operativi o di una negligenza di un fornitore terzo.
- Oltre al reddito, questa classe di azioni può distribuire plusvalenze di capitale realizzate e non realizzate e il capitale inizialmente investito. Sono dedotti dal capitale anche commissioni, oneri e spese. Entrambi i fattori possono comportare l’erosione del capitale e un potenziale ridotto di crescita del medesimo. Si richiama l’attenzione degli investitori anche sul fatto che le distribuzioni di tale natura possono essere trattate (e quindi imponibili) come reddito, secondo la legislazione fiscale locale.