Subscribe
Sign up for timely perspectives delivered to your inbox.
Nicholas Ware, fixed income portfolio manager, provides a fresh update on credit markets, arguing that near-term political and economic uncertainty supports the case for investing in bonds from issuers that offer ‘sensible income’.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk. The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens.
High-yield or “junk” bonds involve a greater risk of default and price volatility and can experience sudden and sharp price swings.
References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised. Past performance does not predict future returns. Yields may vary over time and are not guaranteed.
Nicholas Ware: Hi, I want to talk about the credit market to the end of 2024 and what to expect. We know the economies are slowing and you have central banks delivering rate cuts.
It is a healthy environment for credit. I think the market will stay unpredictable and bumpy for a while, so it’s best to hold on to a portfolio that includes sensible income investments.
Credit markets have performed well year to date with the benefit of carry providing a nice return. There have been three economic and political events which caused a sell off during the year, but which quickly reversed as the dip has been bought. So they were in April, Israel-Palestine, June, the French elections and early August, the weak US employment data. The 2024 credit market I can characterise as being a range-bound credit market.
I think the all-in yield proposition despite the sovereign rally since May still holds, albeit spreads look a touch rich.
We are seeing a nice tailwind from fund inflows too as investors want to lock in yields. The first week in September we saw the fifth largest issuance week ever in US investment grade and that was taken down very well by the market.
In terms of outlook?
I think we will see some spread widening for a couple of months till the end of October. The driver likely being US election volatility and the pricing in of some form of hard landing.
But ultimately into year end, I think you’ll still end up with a positive total return with the benefit of carry outweighing any spread widening in both investment grade and high yield.
We passed through the Q2 earnings season, which looked fine and leverage metrics still look robust in both the US and Europe for investment grade, with some weakening in high yield.
We are currently going through the conference season as it is called where companies go to conferences. And there have been some slight deterioration and we are anticipating weakening in companies exposed to low-end consumers and also the consumer staples sector.
But overall, I would say the credit market is in fairly good shape. The driver of this I think are companies in general through this expansion have been cautious. We have seen evidence of this through business surveys, which are showing a worse picture than the actual hard data. And that has been true since this cycle started post the COVID outbreak.
We have seen no build-up of leverage, speculative M&A or over-expansion through this cycle.
I think most of the public credit markets, so the investment grade and high yield market, are coming into the slowdown relatively clean, with no obvious vulnerabilities.
We think buying sensible income, both in investment grade and high yield makes sense here given that backdrop.
Sensible income is a mantra that we use to define us.
We avoid lending money to certain industries because of inherent cyclicality, such as autos and airlines. Plus their inability to generate a good free cash flow return on investment over time
To give an example of a sensible income company. Iron Mountain is one of those quiet bond issuers. It is rated BB-. It is a storage and data centre business, which is listed in the US. It has managed the transition from just being a document storage business, which was in small organic decline, into a combined data storage and document storage business and it has done that very well.
In the analysis, the business risk, the predictability of cash flow, asset protection and overall financial health of the company merit a higher quality rating.
Iron Mountain’s fundamental [strength] is gaining more recognition in the equity market than it is doing from the credit rating agencies.
Like in August, I think the market through to year end will be closely examining clues on whether we’re heading for a soft or a hard landing. I think these periods will cause volatility and present us with opportunities.
Currently, what we like is investment grade in the 3 to 5 year maturity bucket and the 7 to 10 year maturity range as well. And also BB high yield.
We think a barbell of lower duration, sensible credit exposure and taking long duration via sovereign exposure makes sense here, given that market backdrop.