On the back of recent cooling in economic growth, an uptick in unemployment, and moderating inflation, the Federal Reserve (Fed) looks set to begin its rate-cutting cycle at its September meeting.

Futures markets are anticipating more than 200 basis points (bps) of rate cuts over the next 12 months, bringing the lower bound of the federal funds rate back under 3.25%, from the current 5.25%. Expectations are for the central bank’s benchmark rate to settle around 3.00% through 2026 and into 2027.

With the prospect of declining interest rates, investors may be asking the following questions:

Should I rotate out of short duration into long-duration bonds? If I do maintain an allocation to short duration, which sectors might best suit my investment goals? Should high-quality, floating-rate bonds still command a strategic allocation in my fixed income portfolio?

Why maintain an allocation to short duration through a rate-cutting cycle?

Historically, most of the move down in long-term yields has taken place before the Fed starts cutting, not after (i.e., long-term yields generally move in anticipation of rate cuts). The current cycle is no exception, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rallying to around 3.87% in August 2024, from 4.99% in October 2023.

While long-term yields could rally further, the market is anticipating they will not do so unless we enter a recession. As shown in Exhibit 1, the expectation is that short-term yields will fall over the next two years, with little change to 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields.

What does this mean for investors?

1. We believe investors should not indiscriminately rotate from short- to long-duration bonds simply because rate cuts are imminent. Investors who do so may be disappointed if long-term yields do not decline as much as they’d hoped. Maintaining an allocation to short duration adds diversification, while also providing a buffer in case rates do not fall as quickly as the market anticipates.
2. We believe investors should continue to lean into the attractive yields at the front end of the yield curve. As shown in Exhibit 1, because short-term yields are presently so much higher than long-term yields, even following the anticipated rate cuts, the yield curve is expected to end up flat (i.e., short-term yields at similar levels to those on the long end).
3. Investors who are concerned about a recession might complement their short-duration holdings with a long-duration asset that carries virtually no credit risk – such as agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) – to provide some portfolio defense.

What options do investors have for filling their short-duration bucket?

As rates have moved higher in recent years, investors have flocked to short-duration corporate bonds or cash/money market funds to fill their short-duration bucket. But while the yields are enticing, we believe these sectors may not be the optimal choice for long-term investors seeking better risk-adjusted returns.

According to our analysis, investors will likely be better served with an allocation to AAA rated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), for the following reasons.

1. Spread return matters, especially when rates go lower

AAA CLOs have historically paid a higher credit spread – or additional income above the risk-free rate – than short-duration investment-grade (IG) corporates and cash. On average, between August 2014 and August 2024, AAA CLOs paid an additional 144 bps over the risk-free rate, compared to 70 bps for short-duration IG corporates and 0 bps for cash/money market funds.

As shown in Exhibit 2, these spread differences might appear less significant when rates are hovering around their multi-decade highs. However, when rates start to decline, the additional income paid by AAA CLOs will become a greater proportion of the total yield and will also help investors to continue to receive an income stream even if rates hypothetically go to zero.

In contrast, cash and money market funds pay nothing when rates go to zero, leaving investors without an income stream from their short-duration holdings.

As shown in Exhibit 3, the additional credit spread paid by AAA CLOs has translated into higher cumulative total returns versus short-duration IG corporates and cash.

2. Higher yields need not come at the cost of lower credit quality

At an index level, AAA CLOs exhibit higher credit quality than short-duration IG corporates. Investors may increase yield while also improving the overall credit quality of their portfolios by incorporating an allocation to AAA CLOs.

3. The precedent of 2019’s rate-cutting cycle

In our view, investors who remain concerned about short duration in a declining rate environment may find it helpful to compare today’s environment to the second half of 2019 – the most recent rate-cutting environment.

The Fed made three rate cuts of 25 bps each during the second half of 2019, taking its benchmark rate from 2.5% to 1.75% by year end. (The Fed subsequently cut rates to zero in March 2020 with the onset of COVID-19).

At that time, the yield curve was slightly inverted (3-month versus 10-year inversion peaked at -51 bps) and Fed rate cuts resulted in the curve flattening out. Today, we also anticipate the yield curve to flatten out, but it is more heavily inverted at -128 bps (3-month yields are 128 bps higher than 10-year yields), which, in our view, makes floating-rate even more appealing than in 2019.

As shown in Exhibit 5, AAA CLOs continued to generate consistent positive returns amid these rate cuts. Once again, despite the downtrend in rates, the credit spread within AAA CLOs supported ongoing income returns.

While short-duration IG corporates marginally outperformed AAA CLOs during that period, they did so with far higher volatility.

4. Lower-correlation volatility and improved risk-adjusted returns

Some investors – not wanting to put their short-term cash reserves at risk – may feel uneasy with any volatility within their short-duration bucket. (As represented by average rolling 1-year standard deviation in Exhibit 6, AAA CLOs and short-duration IG corporates do exhibit some volatility in contrast to cash, which is essentially a zero-volatility asset.)

However, according to our analysis, we believe many investors are too cautious in this regard and could handle more volatility in their short-duration bucket in exchange for higher potential returns. Historically, despite occasional drawdowns, AAA CLOs have still ended up comfortably ahead of cash over the long term.

Further, while drawdowns do occur in AAA CLOs, they are relatively small compared to other risk assets, have not been common historically, and the asset class has typically recovered within one or two quarters. In our view, aside from maintaining a modest cash allocation for immediate needs (0-3 months), we believe investors would be better served over the long term by taking on a small amount of volatility to improve their portfolio’s income-earning potential.

As shown in Exhibit 7, adding CLOs to the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (U.S. Agg) may have improved long-term risk-adjusted returns, by increasing total return while also reducing standard deviation.

Conclusion

We believe investors should maintain diversification within their fixed income portfolios throughout the interest rate cycle. Therefore, in our view, an allocation to short duration remains highly relevant in the current environment, particularly considering how attractive short-term yields are.

Further, optimizing total return for one’s entire portfolio is vital to improving long-term risk-adjusted returns. As such, we believe a strategic allocation to AAA CLOs, with their attractive floating-rate yields, high credit quality, and low correlation to other fixed income sectors, remains a key component of a strategic fixed income allocation.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Derivatives can be more volatile and sensitive to economic or market changes than other investments, which could result in losses exceeding the original investment and magnified by leverage.

Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk.  The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa.  The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens.

Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) are debt securities issued in different tranches, with varying degrees of risk, and backed by an underlying portfolio consisting primarily of below investment grade corporate loans. The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if payments are not made timely or credit strength weakens. CLOs are subject to liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, call risk and the risk of default of the underlying assets.

Diversification neither assures a profit nor eliminates the risk of experiencing investment losses.

[jh_content_filter spoke=”uspa”]

[/jh_content_filter]