Subscribe
Sign up for timely perspectives delivered to your inbox.
Portfolio managers Greg Kuhl and Danny Greenberger examine the competitive advantages afforded by scale in the real estate investment trusts (REITs) sector.
In previous posts, we talked about how in the last decade, both the composition and quality of listed real estate has been changing for the better, making it a relevant investment today and in the future (REITs 3.0). Here we discuss the many benefits of scale, which offers competitive advantages for some leading REITs companies.
There are now 28 US real estate investment trusts (REITs) included in the S&P 500 Index, compared with 15 REITs in 20121, reflecting the depth and evolution of listed REITs exhibiting scale. Scale in property investments, derived from informational advantages, technology investments, and relationships with tenants and brokers, is worth exploring because of its value proposition for REIT owners, investors, and tenants.
Structural characteristics inherent to REITs – long-term stewardship by dedicated management teams coupled with relatively easy access to capital – has allowed some firms in the sector to build formidable positions of scale while investing over the long term to enhance the tenant experience and increase employee productivity. By being well positioned to deliver value for employees, tenants, and shareholders through these scale positions, REITs have furthered their competitive advantage in local sub-markets, which can result in REITs becoming favoured acquirers and developers of property assets.
Executives of listed REITs report to shareholder boards and are compensated to create shareholder value over both the short and longer term. REIT management teams also usually have significant equity in their businesses, incentivising long-term strategic decisions to build local market scale and leading operational capabilities. REITs thus contrast with unlisted real estate vehicles (eg. non-traded REITs and open-ended funds) where investments are directed by investment advisors who are not employees of the funds in which they deploy capital; rather, these managers are ‘serial recyclers of capital’ who invest when capital has been raised and sell during fund harvesting cycles. As perpetual operating businesses with permanent capital (managed for an unlimited period), some REITs have methodically built positions of scale by concentrating capital in specific property types and geographies.
Notable examples of listed REITs with scale include:
Possessing scale in property offers a clear informational advantage. Those with a broader portfolio within a sub-market will have access to the most data and specialist information on factors like tenant traffic, leasing economics, and supply, meaning they are better informed about risks and opportunities compared to landlords with more limited holdings. Better information may translate to stronger asset performance as management teams are more equipped to make timely investment decisions. For example, they can respond quickly to fluctuating market conditions by adjusting asking rental rates or by adding or reducing exposure to certain markets. Given REITs typically have long-standing relationships with local investment brokers and superior market intelligence, those with scale are more likely to have an enviable platform to source investment opportunities to meet the specific needs of tenants.
As the REIT asset class evolves, the long-term orientation of REITs has led some leading companies across the sector to concentrate assets in specific property types and sub-markets (also known as ‘clustering’), fostering operational and competitive advantages and dominant local market positions. Clustering allows leasing agents and maintenance technicians to operate and provide services for assets within a sub-market that have similar requirements. For example, technicians can often repair equipment or service maintenance requests across more than one asset within a sub-market, thereby offering REITs a productivity boost to potentially support higher profit margins.
As they tend to be well-capitalised owner-operators, many REITs have also invested in technology to optimise the operational performance of their assets. Within residential, ‘smart home’ hubs are providing digital entry and utilities control, resulting in cost savings for residents, as well as enabling self-guided touring for prospective residents. Furthermore, the use of automated chat bots has allowed tenants to log service requests more efficiently, resulting in faster response times from maintenance personnel. These tech tools have concurrently often resulted in increased tenant satisfaction and higher employee productivity.
Compared to property markets in other countries, the US REIT sector has the longest history and is the most mature and progressive, which has driven a higher absorption of US properties under REIT ownership, as assets should naturally flow to the firms with the highest productivity over time.
Although the REIT regime is less established outside of the US, many non-US leading REIT companies are also adopting a similar strategy of concentrating acquisitions and infusing technology into their operating platforms to create value for stakeholders. This complementary nature of scale and operating acumen seen across REITs underscores the sector’s formidable growth prospects moving forward.
2021 marked a stellar year of returns for REITs, with the FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed Index in USD delivering more than 27% in total returns compared with 22% for global equities.2 With investor concerns about inflation and the prospects for higher interest rates, REITs may not repeat last year’s exemplary returns given past performance should not be considered as a guide to future returns, yet we remain encouraged by the sector’s focus on operating sophistication and alignment to drive value over the long term.
Own. Innovate. Diversify
Find out more