Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Multi Sector Income: election insights — how bond markets may react - Janus Henderson Investors

Multi Sector Income: election insights — how bond markets may react

John Lloyd

John Lloyd

Lead, Multi-Sector Credit Strategies | Portfolio Manager


12 Feb 2020
3 minute read

How will the 2020 US presidential election impact bond markets? Co-Head of Global Credit Research and Portfolio Manager on the Multi-Sector Income Strategy, John Lloyd, anticipates more risk should a left-leaning candidate win the Democratic nomination, with increased volatility possible in sectors such as banking, health care, energy and technology.

 Key takeaways

  • Bond markets have not had a strong reaction to election risk so far this year, given that a more moderate candidate (former Vice President Joe Biden) is currently a front runner in polls.
  • Should a more left-leaning candidate win the Democratic nomination, we would expect to see increased volatility in certain sectors.
  • With Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders both running on a Medicare-for-All platform, health care could face significant ramifications while the banking, energy and technology sectors could also be impacted by some of Warren’s proposed regulations.
 This video was recorded at the end of January 2020.

Video transcript

John Lloyd: Year-to-date, the bond market has been very sanguine with political election risk. And I think that partly goes to… Biden is the front runner in most of the polls right now. As long as he comes out as the Democratic front runner against Trump, I don’t think we will see much uncertainty priced into the market.

However, there is, I think, some more tail risk if you have a left-leaning candidate such as [Senator Bernie] Sanders or [Senator Elizabeth] Warren win the Democratic nomination. And I think if that happens, you could get some risk premium priced into the market, just based on the policies that they have announced already, that they would want to try to implement if they were elected.

Globally, we have seen elections and just different referendums go against what the polling has said before the elections took place, whether that is Brexit or even Donald Trump winning the last election. It is very different than having a typical election whether you go back to Clinton or Bush or Obama. I think Trump ushered in this new era of an outsider can win or somebody who is not a centrist can win a presidential election.

If we do see Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders win the nomination – and eventually win the presidency – depending on that outcome in Congress as well, as long as we have some checks and balances, some of that gridlock, I think, in Congress, is good for the markets in general, because it will keep a very centrist policy.

I would expect to see more volatility in health care. Both of them are running on a Medicare-for-All platform and that would have pretty significant ramifications for the health care industry. There are some parts within technology that I think could be affected, because they have talked about breaking up the big tech firms. Banking, especially with Elizabeth Warren, she has been very anti big banks, and I think you would see more regulation come through the pipelines.

Another sector specific to corporate credit, especially within high yield, is the energy sector. 13-14% of the index is energy companies; a lot of those are US-based fracking companies. Elizabeth Warren has come out with a policy that she would actually want to ban fracking on all public land and also try to limit it on private land, as well. So that is an example, I think, that could have pretty large ramifications in the fixed income markets.

 

 

John Lloyd

John Lloyd

Lead, Multi-Sector Credit Strategies | Portfolio Manager


12 Feb 2020
3 minute read

Subscribe

Sign up for timely perspectives delivered to your inbox.

Submit