Subscribe
Sign up for timely perspectives delivered to your inbox.
An often underappreciated fact about bonds is that they are a relatively simple asset class – government bond yields follow the rate of change in growth and inflation in the economy. For the last 12 months, bonds have done a great job diversifying portfolios and equity risk and, as growth peaked and inflation peaked, bond yields peaked around the world and bond prices rallied significantly thereafter as bond yields fell.
Going forward, into 2020, the question is whether the decline in economic growth and inflation is coming to an end. That is the debate that has been going around in financial circles since September. Equity markets have their view, which is, as usual, more optimistic than that of the bond market. However, there are signs that the manufacturing cycle may be bottoming (see chart) and that the rate of change in growth and inflation may begin to pick up once more. In which case, sovereign bonds will have a tougher time as one would expect. Corporate bonds would perform better in this reflationary environment.
Source: Bloomberg, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 31 December 2019
Note: Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index versus a lead indicator (new orders minus inventories). The index, a widely viewed indicator of recent US economic activity, is based on a survey of purchasing managers and monitors monthly changes in production levels.
Bond funds should behave like bond funds — that is a central pillar of our strategy. There should not be any surprises for clients and hopefully they know our philosophy and our strategy.
We believe quite passionately in active asset allocation. In practice that means changing the allocation to different asset classes as frequently as we deem necessary to suit the economic climate and prevailing markets. Thus, we are not a slave to gilts or sovereign bonds, investment grade or high yield corporate bonds, or loans.
We can, and do, vary the interest rate sensitivity (duration) and the credit sensitivity of our portfolios — independently of each other — is seeking to achieve good, long-term, reliable returns for clients. Importantly, we focus very heavily on the downside risk to avoid having big capital losses at any time. The latter focus chimes with our stock selection, which we describe as ‘sensible income’. We tend to invest in large, non-cyclical, reliable and quality businesses, which over time, we have found should not let us down.
For a number of years now, we have held a non-consensual view on bond yields and interest rates, believing that they would stay low for a very long period of time. We never agreed with the consensus view that bond yields and bond markets were a bubble — 2019 has confirmed that. If anything, consensus has now come around to our view.
In recent months ‘Japanification’ has been talked about ad infinitum in financial circles and, central banks around the globe have also begun to shift their stance; now saying that the biggest challenge is that inflation is too low and has been too low since 2009. In particular, the US Federal Reserve has changed its view, which is very different to 18 months ago, when it thought inflation taking off would be the biggest challenge. Thus, while we have not changed our philosophy or approach, it is interesting that consensus has come around to our view of the world.
The irony is that we spend our lives looking at endless charts. We carry out significant amounts of research to see if there is confirmation between different charts or between different asset classes and, whether they corroborate or contradict existing views and evidence. However, one key chart could be the performance of the US dollar.
Source: Bloomberg, US dollar index DXY, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 31 December 2019.
Note: the US dollar index, DXY
There is obviously significant debate as to whether we are in a soft landing and it is mid-cycle, or a hard landing and it is late-cycle in economies. The first case is more an equity view of the world and the second case reflects more of a bond view of the world. However, in our mind, a significant soft landing and a reflation, is unlikely without a soft (structurally lower) US dollar.
Against that we look at endless charts, of which many are important. The price of oil (general proxy for demand), the shape of the yield curve (of course we do, we are bond people!), financial conditions and money supply are probably the most topical ones. There are a hundred more to be honest but really the dollar is the ‘tell’ and that’s the one which in my opinion, is really significant.
We are currently in a reflationary period. It is hard to determine its strength or longevity. Consquently, we have pared back duration to around four years, awaiting developments. We may well extend duration again in the spring or summer.
Duration: how far a fixed income security or portfolio is sensitive to a change in interest rates, expressed in years. The larger the figure, the more sensitivity to a movement in interest rates.
Economic cycle: the fluctuation of the economy between expansion (growth) and contraction (recession). It is influenced by many factors including household, government and business spending, trade, technology and central bank policy.
(Economic) soft/hard landing: soft landing refers to a cyclical downturn in an economy that avoids recession; a hard landing by contrast is a marked economic slowdown, which could slip the economy into a recession.
Japanification: a term describing Japan’s battle over three decades with low growth and low/negative inflation, characterised by extraordinary monetary stimulus propelling bond yields lower.
Reflation: in simple terms, this refers to a return of inflation.
Yield curve: a graph that plots the yields of similar quality bonds against their maturities. A yield curve can signal market expectations about a country’s economic direction.