Subscribe
Sign up for timely perspectives delivered to your inbox.
Liquid alternatives have seen steady adoption since the financial crisis. With a proliferation of funds across categories, these strategies have provided access to benefits that were previously available to only a small cadre of investors: diversified sources of returns, alternate tools for wealth protection, and new means for lowering overall volatility.
While such benefits are compelling, our conversations with advisors have unearthed yet another dimension of the alternatives equation: the broad variety of strategies now available can also create confusion and actually muddle an understanding of their role in investor portfolios. Furthermore, because these funds tend to be costlier than traditional asset classes, investors may be paying a high premium for unintended or redundant exposures.
Source: Janus Henderson Portfolio Diagnostics. as of 3/31/18.
When our clients use alternatives, we continue to ask them: Are they included in the portfolio to diversify your equities, your fixed income or both? The truth is, all alternative strategies have some fundamental connection to traditional asset classes, and very few are likely to generate extreme returns or offer guaranteed wealth protection. Moreover, the flexibility that these investments enjoy may cause their exposures to change over time, requiring more extensive oversight and due diligence. Conducting a realistic assessment and implementing a liquid alts strategy with clarity of objectives can make their benefits well worth the effort and cost.
In evaluating traditional equity or fixed income options, we tend to focus on return potential and overall risk level. In the case of alternatives, it’s important to think about the relative behavior of a strategy, i.e., how it interacts with other assets within a portfolio.
This is the basis for the newly introduced Morningstar Alternative Style Box, which reports the characteristics of liquid alt strategies relative to global equities. On one axis, the style box shows the correlation of a strategy’s returns to the MSCI All Country World Index (MSCI ACWI) and on the other, relative volatility, using the ratio of the strategy’s standard deviation of returns to that of the MSCI ACWI.
Morningstar Category Average vs. MSCI ACWI (4/1/2015 – 3/31/2018)
Source: Morningstar
With this in mind, we thought it would be useful to lay out a framework for determining what specific job an alt should be playing in a portfolio. In suggesting such a framework, we examine key metrics that may be used for determining whether it can successfully perform this role, and from which part of the portfolio the position should be allocated.
Many alts are designed to be a source of wealth protection. As with bonds, these strategies aim for low correlation to equities, while maintaining low volatility and moderate returns. They typically seek to provide higher-risk adjusted returns and to protect portfolios from interest rate risk.
Source: Morningstar, Inc.
Alts that have been higher in measures of upside and volatility should be considered in lieu of conventional equities. These strategies target absolute returns and growth that is less correlated to equity beta. Many deploy derivatives to alter the exposure to beta, while others have the ability to short sectors and stocks that are perceived as overvalued.
Source: Morningstar, Inc.
Some alternative options lie between bonds and stocks in their risk/return profile, but offer diversification effects compared to both categories. As such, reducing both fixed and equity allocations can preserve returns while incrementally lowering portfolio volatility.
Source: Morningstar, Inc.
Source: Janus Henderson Portfolio Diagnostics, as of 3/31/18.
Multialternative strategies are by far the most widely used alternative category, accounting for almost a third of all asset flows to alternatives between 2007 and 2016.1 In fact, of those models holding alternatives that we have analyzed, 38% of the positions belong in the Morningstar Multialternative category.
Because of their prominence, it is worth emphasizing that they are especially diverse in their characteristics. As illustrated below, the category does little to define the type of fund and many are closer in volatility and correlation to the median of other alternative categories. Thus, such one-stop-shopping solutions need to be carefully evaluated on an individual basis and a determination made as to what benefits might be expected vs. whether a more specialized fund offering similar exposure might be more sensible. The ideal Multialternative may fall in the middle of the style box, striking a balance between low correlation and moderate volatility.
Morningstar Multialternative Funds and Alternative Category Averages vs. MSCI ACWI (4/1/2015 – 3/31/2018)
Source: Morningstar
Many investors mistakenly look to alternatives for short-term, on-demand outcomes. Remembering the headline-grabbing early days of hedge funds, some have a lingering expectation that alternative investments can or should provide off-the-charts returns or magically uncorrelated growth.
So what should your alts be doing? Are they included in the portfolio to diversify your equities, your fixed income or both? The key is to use the framework above to get a sense for how a fund could affect a larger portfolio. Remember, because alternatives tend to have far more flexibility than most traditional funds, the categories in which they are grouped tend to be more heterogeneous, therefore it is important to also consider the individual fund’s objectives, process, expected returns and price and to conduct periodic and extensive due diligence, to ensure that they are delivering the assets, diversification and result you expect.
Place the right alternative, in the right role, in the right portfolio, and you will be in a good position to benefit from the diversification, growth and/or protection they are meant to provide.