Quick View: How are tariffs reshaping the market for European smaller caps?
As the impact of a new tariff regime spreads across the market, Portfolio Manager Ollie Beckett considers the potential for European smaller companies to adapt and thrive.

4 minute read
Key takeaways:
- Tariffs are expected to reduce demand in the US for European-produced goods, given higher prices, and there are fears of further consequences as major economic blocs like the EU and China respond.
- European smaller companies are on extremely low valuations, suggesting investors can potentially position themselves to benefit from a renewed focus on defence, growth stimulative infrastructure spending and deregulation in Europe.
- While markets are responding en masse to uncertainty, longer-term, we expect it to favour careful stock selection strategies, with a focus on companies with strong balance sheets.
Giving insight into the impact of US President Trump’s tariffs on European smaller companies can be a tricky topic, as it requires some certainty as to the logic behind their implementation and the policy goals that they aim to achieve. The idea that the US can resolve all bilateral trade deficits in this manner is beyond comprehension and one doubts that it is the real policy goal being pursued. One thing we would expect is for tariffs to reduce the overall welfare of the US consumer, with some distributional effects both within the US and globally.
All else being equal the tariffs would be expected to make the prices of European-produced goods in the US more expensive, likely reducing demand for them. This is clearly negative for European companies that export to the US. The fact that tariffs on China look to be dramatic also has an impact as many European companies produce in Asia and ship to the US.
What could happen next?
As a knock-on effect of US tariffs, we expect China to try and offload excess capacity elsewhere in the world, leading to more competition for domestically produced goods in Europe, and thus likely lower margins for European businesses. Herein lies the big risk. Should the EU Customs Union retaliate and put tariffs on the US? Should the EU Customs Union protect domestic producers from Chinese supply by imposing tariffs on China? Very quickly we could end up in a global trade war as protectionism escalates and that would be devastating for the global economy.
Countries with a trade surplus typically fare less well in a trade war and this means there is a big risk to Europe and to China if they retaliate. Nonetheless, we saw China respond in tit-for-tat fashion to the US, with each side escalating in a damaging stand-off.
China has, however, anticipated a trade war and has been planning for this situation. There is considerable scope to drive consumption in China and create a source of domestic demand that could cushion the economy. Europe typically struggles to act with the same decisiveness as China and responses are unlikely to be co-ordinated. For that reason, we hope that the EU charts a careful course in its response. The US has, headline rhetoric aside, implied it is open to negotiations on tariffs and there is a scenario where tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers are negotiated down.
What are the implications for European smaller caps?
Recent times have shown us that the world is a much more uncertain and dangerous place than Europe had complacently assumed. Defence spending is clearly going to have to go up, given concerns about the durability of the Western Alliance. This has generally been seen as an opportunity for defence companies and some defence-adjacent businesses, and recent market volatility could represent an opportunity for stock picking investors to augment their exposure to this area.
In less certain times, one way to drive economic growth is to unleash housebuilding, and this could represent an opportunity to position around a housing recovery in a European market that has been stagnant since 2022. Globally positioned companies with diversified production across countries could appeal too, given that they might not face tariffs in the same way. Countries with sufficient debt capacity to spend on stimulating their economy are likely to have more options than those who have already burdensome debt loads – Germany stands out here as having fiscal room to act.
Conversely, investors are likely to frown on companies with bad balance sheets. Now is not the time to be struggling with debt or high costs, especially if a company is vulnerable to the price shock of tariffs. We would also be cautious on European companies producing in China and exporting to the US – the US-China dispute does not seem like an argument that will be quickly resolved.
More broadly, European smaller companies are coming into this shock on extremely low valuations. Global stock markets have been mesmerised by ‘American exceptionalism’ in recent years and this has resulted in a heavy concentration into mega cap technology stocks. However, Europe is home to plenty of great companies with great balance sheets that can be bought at what we see as very attractive prices, given the impact of current market stress. The only real response from Europe to MAGA has to be MEGA – Make Europe Great Again. Build houses, build infrastructure, rearm and deregulate. The fact this strategy seems to be on the cards in Europe gives room for optimism.
Fiscal policy: Describes government policy relating to setting tax rates and spending levels. Fiscal policy is separate from monetary policy, which is typically set by a central bank.
Mega caps: The largest designation for companies in terms of market capitalisation. Companies with a valuation (market capitalisation) above $200 billion in the US are considered mega caps. These tend to be major, highly recognisable companies with international exposure, often comprising a significant weighting in an index.
Small caps: Companies with a valuation (market capitalisation) within a certain scale, eg. $300 million to $2 billion in the US, although these measures are generally an estimate. Small cap stocks tend to offer the potential for faster growth than their larger peers, but with greater volatility.
Tariffs: A tax or duty imposed by a government on goods imported from other countries.
Trade deficit: Where a country imports more goods and services than it exports.
Valuations: The valuation of a company according to its current market (stock) price, often used to assess whether a stock is attractively valued or over-priced.
Volatility: The rate and extent at which the price of a portfolio, security or index, moves up and down. If the price swings up and down with large movements, it has high volatility. If the price moves more slowly and to a lesser extent, it has lower volatility. The higher the volatility the higher the risk of the investment.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised.
Marketing Communication.
Important information
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
- Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
- If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
- The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
Specific risks
- Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
- Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
- If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
- The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.