A delayed verdict: the FCA’s motor finance review, a risk to UK auto ABS?
The FCA has delayed announcing its findings from a review into banned commission arrangements in the auto finance sector. Research analyst Sarah Asquith and portfolio manager Ian Bettney discuss how for investors in UK auto asset backed securities (ABS), risks are likely low.
3 minute read
Key takeaways:
- The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has delayed announcing its findings from a review into banned commission arrangements in the auto finance sector, with continued uncertainty in terms of outcomes.
- For investors in UK auto asset backed securities (ABS) we believe risks are low due to various factors including generally low exposure to the loans in question, significant credit enhancement, and structural de-linkage from the original lender.
- Investors should keep an eye out for the findings of the review, but in our view, we believe risks to them are low.
Last week brought news that the announcement of findings from the FCA’s review of discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) has been pushed back to May 2025. For background, DCAs allowed brokers to link their commissions to the interest rates on customer auto loans. The FCA banned the practice in 2021, to remove the incentive for brokers to set higher auto loan interest rates for customers.
The potential outcomes from the review (including remediations to consumers) begs the question: are there any risks to UK auto ABS investors? We think the risk, in terms of ABS rating downgrades and collateral losses, is low. Here’s why:
Across outstanding UK auto ABS, exposure to pre-2021 loans is generally quite low and continues to decrease as transactions pay down. Where deals are still revolving, some issuers are ensuring that any new pre-2021 originations will not be included in portfolio top-ups. Moreover, some new transactions have explicitly been structured to outright exclude these pre-2021 originations. Deals that do have exposure to pre-2021 loans will likely have credit enhancement materially in excess of any potential losses, particularly for investors in higher-rated tranches.
It is expected that any resulting remediation and potential fines would target the auto finance companies. Given that ABS transactions are structurally de-linked from these lenders, we consider insolvency of the lender to be the biggest risk here both in terms of potential set-off claims from borrowers and servicing disruptions. However, most transactions are supported by financially strong sponsors and securitisations can be structured to facilitate the transfer of servicing if needed. Since announcement of the review, we have seen varied responses from the market, from banks setting aside significant provisions for potential remediations or announcing they will not be paying dividends for FY 2024 to strengthen their balance sheet, to one lender telling us they outright never used DCAs.
Collectively, we think the aforementioned factors mean that risks to UK auto ABS remain pretty low – securitisation investors should look to the findings of the review in May 2025 (and the likely resulting consultations) but in our view, can take reassurance that losses are highly unlikely to be realised.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised. Past performance does not predict future returns.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
Marketing Communication.
JHI
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised.
Marketing Communication.
Important information
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall.
- When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise (or are expected to rise). This risk is typically greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
- Some bonds (callable bonds) allow their issuers the right to repay capital early or to extend the maturity. Issuers may exercise these rights when favourable to them and as a result the value of the Fund may be impacted.
- The Fund may use derivatives to help achieve its investment objective. This can result in leverage (higher levels of debt), which can magnify an investment outcome. Gains or losses to the Fund may therefore be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
- The Fund invests in Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) and other forms of securitised investments, which may be subject to greater credit / default, liquidity, interest rate and prepayment and extension risks, compared to other investments such as government or corporate issued bonds and this may negatively impact the realised return on investment in the securities.
Specific risks
3 minute read
Key takeaways:
- The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has delayed announcing its findings from a review into banned commission arrangements in the auto finance sector, with continued uncertainty in terms of outcomes.
- For investors in UK auto asset backed securities (ABS) we believe risks are low due to various factors including generally low exposure to the loans in question, significant credit enhancement, and structural de-linkage from the original lender.
- Investors should keep an eye out for the findings of the review, but in our view, we believe risks to them are low.