Quick View: No time like the present – the Fed commences rate-cutting cycle
Global Head of Fixed Income Jim Cielinski and Head of Global Short Duration and Liquidity Daniel Siluk explain how a bond allocation can shine in a period of falling rates and plodding economic growth.
7 minute read
Key takeaways:
- Steadily falling inflation afforded the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) the luxury of cutting its policy rate by 50 basis points without sounding alarm bells on the economy.
- Investors should differentiate between the Fed cutting rates into a soft-landing scenario and cutting into a harder landing, with the former still the consensus given a resilient labor market and steady consumer demand.
- We believe that an allocation to higher quality corporate credits as well as duration exposure could complement a diversified portfolio in either a soft- or hard-landing scenario given bonds’ ability to generate income and preserve capital.
In the lead up to the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) September meeting, we’ve watched – with a degree of bewilderment – many market participants’ near obsession with the size of today’s rate cut. Whether 25 basis point (bps) or 50 bps, the data that guide monetary policy indicate that the time is now to step away from a restrictive stance.
More germane to investors is whether the Fed is behind the curve. Reducing rates into a resilient U.S. economy (the crowded soft-landing scenario) or cutting into a stalling economy marked by a rapidly cooling labor market (a hard landing) have very different ramifications for financial markets. Fed Chairman Jay Powell took great pains to frame today’s decision as what we would categorize as a bullish cut. Rather than a paradox, his rhetoric – peppered with words like balanced, confident and resilient – was aimed at signaling that the “strong” 50 bps reduction was not a cause for alarm, but a prudent initial step in normalizing policy.
When divining insight into how to position portfolios during this unique period of cutting rates when there are few signs of a struggling economy, our focus has been on how the Fed sees developments unfolding over the next year and how that will influence the terminal rate for this cycle.
The luxury of lower inflation
We believe the Fed’s larger move was justified as it signaled that this wave of generational inflation is behind us. Perhaps defying expectations, the Fed was able to keep rates at 5.50% for an extended period because the U.S. labor market proved more impervious to higher rates than expected. While not setting off alarm bells, recent softening within the labor market, in the Fed’s own words, has caused it to shift to a more balanced approach toward its dual mandate. Given the past year’s progress on inflation, the Fed had the luxury to go big with this initial cut without unduly spooking the market.
Data within the updated Summary of Economic Projections accompanying the meeting bear this out. Fed officials now see the unemployment rate finishing 2024 at 4.4% and remaining at the level through the end of next year. While still lower than levels that would be consistent with a material slowdown, the degree to which unemployment has risen has likely forced the Fed to be more vigilant with respect to potential downside surprises.
Exhibit 1: Updated Fed Summary of Economic Projections
Modestly higher unemployment is the price the Fed is willing to pay to keep inflation on its downward trajectory.
Source: Bloomberg, as at 18 September 2024.
Although the increase in the unemployment rate has been largely driven by workers entering the labor force, some leading indicators of labor market health have grown wobblier. Job openings are 37% beneath their post-pandemic peak, inflation-adjusted wage growth, while still positive, has trended down and the four-week average of initial jobless claims – a proxy for a feared wave of layoffs – has risen from 201,000 to 231,000 thousand. As with the unemployment rate, this level remains well below what would be associated with economic contraction.
Modest softening in the labor market is likely the price the Fed is willing to pay for making progress on returning inflation to its 2.0% objective. For that matter, even with today’s cut, with core inflation at 2.6%, an upper rate limit of 5.0% is still restrictive. The Fed likely believes this level is sufficient to guide headline and core inflation toward its downwardly revised level of 2.1% and 2.2%, respectively, in 2025.
We believe it’s important to note that a 50 bps cut has not materially changed the Fed’s expectation of where the terminal rate for this cycle lies – still sitting between 2.5% and 3.0%.
The cycle lives on?
With the commencement of rate cuts behind us, the market can now focus on what type of landing will occur. Nailing a soft landing is notoriously difficult, and during the Fed’s historic stretch of rate hikes, the prevailing view was that this expansion would end – like most others – at the hands of overly restrictive policy. But over 2024, the pendulum has swung toward a soft-landing. After all, inflation fell without a spike in unemployment and U.S. consumer demand remains strong.
If the economy proved steady when facing a 5.5% policy rate, its resilience could now be buttressed by corporations and households benefiting from lower borrowing costs. The upshot is an extension of the economic cycle and a tailwind for riskier assets that have cyclical exposure or are faced with maturing debt over the midterm. Understanding the boost to the U.S. economy that a lower cost of capital would provide, the Fed, in our view, would have been more reticent to move 50 bps had it not been certain that wage-driven inflation on account of a red-hot labor market was less of a concern.
Some have interpreted the 50 bps move as evidence that the Fed may be behind the curve. Chairman Powell stated this was not the case, and the data seem to back up this claim. Still, one cannot entirely dismiss the risk that the long and variable lag of restrictive policy has yet to fully play out. In this hard-landing scenario, cutting rates would cease to be a luxury and instead become a lifeline seeking to stanch flagging investment and consumption. That cascading of events would mark the end of the post-pandemic expansion.
Taking what the market gives you – namely income and diversification
From a positioning perspective, we do not see today’s move as a game changer for fixed-income investors. The known knowns haven’t changed. Inflation is cooling. The U.S. economy resilient. And the labor market, despite some softening, is nowhere near levels associated with recession. This belies an extension of the cycle that should be favorable for riskier assets, especially higher-quality corporate credits whose fortunes are more exposed to consumer strength. Similarly, companies with higher debt loads should benefit from lower borrowing costs.
Exhibit 2: U.S. Treasuries Yield Curve
After over two years, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury exceeds that of the two year, signaling a likely end to an era of restrictive monetary policy and giving bond investors the opportunity to earn a term premium on longer-dated maturities.
Source: Bloomberg, as at 18 September 2024.
While these companies would be hurt in a hard landing scenario, a fixed income allocation can still aid a broader allocation by offering the potential to preserve capital and serve as a diversifier to riskier equities. In either scenario, the arrival of the rate-reduction cycle means that many points along the yield curve could deliver capital appreciation. In this respect, we believe duration is an investor’s friend. And at current levels, the yield curve still represents levels of income generation that have been a rarity during the past 15 years.
As the unknown unknowns are just that, investors should view an allocation toward higher-quality bonds with sufficient duration exposure as an integral component of a well-diversified portfolio, especially as the Fed seeks to stick the elusive soft landing.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Diversification neither assures a profit nor eliminates the risk of experiencing investment losses.
Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk. The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens.
Basis point (bp) equals 1/100 of a percentage point. 1 bp = 0.01%, 100 bps = 1%.
Duration measures a bond price’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The longer a bond’s duration, the higher its sensitivity to changes in interest rates and vice versa.
Economic cycle: The fluctuation of the economy between expansion (growth) and contraction (recession), commonly measured in terms of gross domestic product (GDP). It is influenced by many factors, including household, government and business spending, trade, technology and central bank policy. The economic cycle consists of four recognised stages. ‘Early cycle’ is when the economy transitions from recession to recovery; ‘mid-cycle’ is the subsequent period of positive (but more moderate) growth. In the ‘late cycle’, growth slows as the economy reaches its full potential, wages start to rise and inflation begins to pick up, leading to lower demand, falling corporate earnings and eventually the fourth stage – recession.
Hard landing: A situation in which measures to bring down inflation lead to negative economic growth and a rise in unemployment.
Monetary Policy refers to the policies of a central bank, aimed at influencing the level of inflation and growth in an economy. It includes controlling interest rates and the supply of money.
Risk assets: Financial securities that may be subject to significant price movements (ie. carrying a greater degree of risk). Examples include equities, commodities, property lower-quality bonds or some currencies.
Soft landing: A situation in which a central bank succeeds in bringing down inflation without significantly harming employment and economic growth levels.
Terminal rate: Economists refer to the terminal rate as the neutral interest rate where prices are stable and full employment is achieved. In other words, it is a natural interest rate that is neither accommodative nor restrictive, and as such is regarded as an equilibrium rate.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised.
Marketing Communication.