An options-implied analysis of the US presidential election – Part III
In part three of a series on the U.S. presidential election, Head of Asset Allocation Ashwin Alankar explains how options markets are likely better indicators of an election’s potential outcome than polling data.
3 minute read
Key takeaways:
- Echoing polling data, which are largely within their margin of error, information within options markets indicates an extremely close race, with former President Trump recently gaining the slightest of edges.
- We believe options prices can contain powerful signals on an election’s potential outcome, as there is a cost to being wrong, and options prices tend to incorporate a broader array of information than polling data.
- With only days remaining until the election, investors would be well served to consider options market signals not only for divining the election’s outcome but also over the longer term to gain insight on how the next administration’s policies could impact the economy.
With just days to go before the pivotal U.S. presidential election, analysts, pundits, and investors are seeking whatever information possible to determine which campaign has the upper hand. Most rely upon an array of polling data, which have lately had a dubious track record in predicting election outcomes. With a bit of creativity, we can use options market signals to gain insights into its view on which party is likely to prevail.
Pricing risk – to the upside and downside
The options market can be considered an insurance market on financial assets. Just like an insurance premium, the price of an option provides information about the expected future risk to an underlying asset. Moreover, rather than just identifying total risk, the options market distinguishes the good risk, or upside volatility of the asset, from the bad risk, or downside volatility. Accordingly, by looking at options prices, one can measure the attractiveness of an asset, such as a stock. Academic research shows that the ratio of upside to downside volatility has good forecast ability in determining the attractiveness of an asset.
Crowdsourced and hard data
We consider the forward-looking information derived from options signals efficient as they are based on the collective insights of thousands of market participants. In other words, it is a crowd-sourced information measure. And unlike polling or survey data, which is soft data, options estimates are hard data as they are based on investments, and there is a monetary cost to being wrong.
Over the past few months, we’ve leveraged the options market to seek insight into the U.S. presidential contest. By identifying a basket of stocks that is aligned with the Democratic party, we can use the options prices of these securities to estimate the attractiveness of the basket. We can then do the same with a Republican basket.
Fortunately, research firm Strategas has constructed such baskets, enabling us to gauge the movement in options prices on these stocks. If the attractiveness of the Democratic basket is greater than the Republican basket, the market implies a greater probability of a Democrat win, and vice versa. The magnitude of the differences in attractiveness should correlate to how much greater probability the options market is assigning to the win of one party versus another.
Priorities
In our analysis, the Democratic basket has exposures to climate-focused companies, technology companies (less protectionism), and healthcare, while the Republican basket has exposures to financials (less regulation), the defense industry, and fossil fuels.
The chart below plots the difference in attractiveness between these two baskets and indicates the options market is very slightly favoring the Republican basket for a potential Trump win. For all intents and purposes, the options market sees the contest as a toss-up. An absolute difference larger than 0.05 would imply a quite strong view or conviction implied from options prices. Today we are far from this level.
Exhibit 1: Relationship of Democrat-to-Republican tail-Sharpe ratios
After a volatile campaign season, the upside potential for the Republican basket of options is slightly more favorable than the signals embedded in the Democrat basket.
Source: Strategas, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 25 October 2024.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Options (calls and puts) involve risks. Option trading can be speculative in nature and carries a substantial risk of loss.
Volatility measures risk using the dispersion of returns for a given investment.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised.
Marketing Communication.
3 minute read
Key takeaways:
- Echoing polling data, which are largely within their margin of error, information within options markets indicates an extremely close race, with former President Trump recently gaining the slightest of edges.
- We believe options prices can contain powerful signals on an election’s potential outcome, as there is a cost to being wrong, and options prices tend to incorporate a broader array of information than polling data.
- With only days remaining until the election, investors would be well served to consider options market signals not only for divining the election’s outcome but also over the longer term to gain insight on how the next administration’s policies could impact the economy.